Newspapers are now newsrooms and in some cases newscentres. Their steady momentum to the end of the day and the print deadline has been replaced by an incessant humming of the 24/7 digital priority.
It is a news manager's challenge to help reshape the culture, and one of those cultures is the layered editing that often improves and occasionally blandizes the reporter's copy.
The Washington Post has done as much as any North American media to operate across platforms in the last decade. Its washingtonpost.com functions separately from the newspaper, in a different state, and while the two complement each other, they have distinctive qualities that make for a slightly different content organization and hierarchy --- and thus a different consumer experience.
In recent days the Post's executive editor, Leonard Downie, has outlined changes to the production of the newspaper to put it on a more aggressive footing in the new environment. His memo  (available through Slate.com) is an insightful elegy to different days and a clear signal that times have forever changed. In particular it is instructive to read how some non-local desks are being merged, how the rhythm of the newsroom will change to adapt to earlier consumer expectations in the day, and how the newsroom will reduce the number of "touches" on a story (they found as many as 12 editors --- yikes --- had handled a story in one instance).

 


Comments

03/19/2008 14:58

One of the astounding bits of info in that Slate piece was the revelation that the slimmed down Post now has about 300 reporters and 300 editors. A one-to-one reporter to editor ratio! I'd love to hear from other readers about how that compares to their newsrooms. At my old paper (The Hamilton Spectator) the current ratio is about 56 writers to 28 editors, a two-to-one ratio. (Editors includes section/dept heads, editorial managers, copy and content editors). I just can't imagine too many news operations carrying that high a proportion of editors in this day and age. Anyone have other newsroom examples?

Reply

Comments are closed.

DA25E68FDEC14EAFA7B2A27D26C48058