The Web analytics firm, Sysomos, has examined the pathology of Twitter and determined that it's not quite the social network one thought --- mainly, people use it to broadcast information but the sharing has its limitations. Sysomos looked at 1.2 billion Tweets over the last two months and found 71% generated no response whatever. Some 23% generated a reply, but a very small percentage (6%) were deemed worth sharing with one's followers upon receipt. And perhaps the more startling finding is how Tweets wither on the vine quickly --- if they're not ReTweeted in the first hour, they tend not to be at all. Some 92% of ReTweeting took place in the first hour, Sysomos found. (It is possible that Twitter streams are so vast that users can't keep track of what they're sent, so they don't dig very far back to look for content to share.) How deep are conversations on Twitter? Sysomos said not very. The number of Tweets three levels deep --- that is, those that are sent, replied to, replied to again and replied to again --- amounts to about 1.5%. In deciphering the noise about Facebook's latest measures on privacy and sharing, Buzzmachine's Jeff Jarvis admits he's been a little baffled. Why have so many people suddenly gotten hostile to the social network? Jarvis thinks it may have to do with Facebook confusing sharing with publishing. In other words, Facebook is assuming that what you put on your page is effectively there for the world, when he thinks it ought to simply be there for the public you've chosen (that is, your Friends and perhaps their Friends). Facebook wants to be the creator and enabler of identities, but cannot because users do not want it to be so, he asserts. 1 Comment New social network: Word of mouth 05/01/2008
Every so often comes research that redeems faith in the human condition. News that the Gannett and Meredith organizations have conscripted a social-networking technology firm to generate new digital enterprises. |
RSS Feed

