It was the turn of Roy Greenslade, the conscientious media writer for The Guardian, to appear before the Leveson inquiry into press ethics. And he delivered an idea: Journalists should sign a "conscience clause" in their contracts to permit them to avoid breaching their codes of conduct.

Greenslade, a professor at City University in London, said journalists should know what they should not be doing and not have their employment threatened when they opt not to do so.
 
The inquiry is examining press ethics and determining what to do following the much-maligned phone-hacking scandal that called into question media standards and practices in the United Kingdom. But the wider world is watching what the inquiry proposes because press standards elsewhere are under scrutiny.
 
 
An ancient debate has resurfaced in recent weeks on whether journalists should be accredited by government. The debate has revived concerns in the craft that the negative consequences could outweigh any privileges of professional registration.

The Quebec government's recent review of media led to a proposal of a new regulatory system that would include a registration system of its journalists. Not surprisingly, the Canadian Association of Journalists has called this an excessive interference in press freedoms.

And in England, the shadow culture secretary for the Labour Party suggested not only a registration system but an ability to "strike off" the bad players, much in the way doctors are for malpractice. Not surprisingly, the idea has its critics, including the Guardian's venerable media writer Roy Greenslade.
 
 
In journalism, some things never change.

Experienced and inexperienced journalists alike know of something commonly called the "death knock," also known as the "pick-up." Someone dies and your role is to persuade a relative or loved one to tell the story of the deceased (the term "pick-up" means getting a photo for publication or broadcast).

This week in England a journalist is appearing before the Press Complaints Commission (the body that crafts national standards for media) to propose a better system to deal with the sensitive encounter of reporter approaching relative.

Chris Wheal, who had to deal with the death knock when his nephew died, suggests the creation of a pamphlet that breaks the ice and asks about five options:

1. Want to sell to the highest bidder (a more British than North American trait)?
2. Want to tell everyone who calls?
3. Want to tell one journalist to distribute to other journalists?
4. Want to supply printed material yourself?
5. Want to have nothing to do with journalists?

Roy Greenslade, in writing about Wheal's proposal as the media writer for The Guardian, notes the challenges.

Who, for instance, should distribute the leaflet? Wheal suggests the commission; Greenslade says it's not practical. Wheal hints a team of volunteers; Greenslade says that's not feasible, either.

Instead, he proposes that the commission help frame a document that could be handed out by Press Association representatives (thus, without a competitive impetus) at accident scenes and similar situations. Greenslade even suggests police could do so (provided, of course, no crime appears involved).

Two other points Greenslade makes: Young reporters shouldn't be dispatched and older reporters shouldn't think there's only one way to do the job.
 

DA25E68FDEC14EAFA7B2A27D26C48058