The Gallup organization said Friday that U.S. media distrust has reached a new high --- or, put another way, media trust has reached a new low.

Some 60 per cent of Americans surveyed said they had little or no trust in the mass media to report accurately, fairly or fully. There has been a slow rate of growth in the level of distrust in the last decade from a rate in the mid- to high-forties. Trust in the media was more positive than negative until 2004.

Gallup notes the pattern in presidential election years for media distrust to peak. Republicans most distrust the media, but more than half of Independents do, too. Democrats are more trusting. While Americans pay more attention to political news in an election year, Gallup notes they are paying less attention in 2012 than they did in 2008.

The poll was conducted in early September.

"On a broad level, Americans' high level of distrust in the media poses a challenge to democracy and to creating a fully engaged citizenry," Gallup concludes. "Media sources must clearly do more to earn the trust of Americans, the majority of whom see the media as biased one way or the other. At the same time, there is an opportunity for others outside the 'mass media' to serve as information sources that Americans do trust."

Romenesko.com has a strong analysis of the findings here.



 
 
The MBA Blogs from Business Week are a frequent source of good media observation. A new post argues that the way for companies to get media is to be media.

By that, it means creating a blog and hiring writers instead of creating a marketing budget and hiring an agency. It means breaking news instead of making it. It means writing about your targeted media list instead of waiting for them to target you.

To many newsrooms, the advice here might feel menacing.
 
 

Reason Magazine poses a controversial question: Could public relations professionals be the replacement for investigative journalists?

Tim Cavanaugh argues that many of the most important world facts have been provided not by journalists but by those in public relations, that the PR world is not necessarily one of spinners and disinformers,

"Flackery requires putting together credible narratives from pools of verifiable data. This activity is not categorically different from journalism," he suggests.

Many would challenge not only that assumption but the issue of whether PR professionals would be in a position to provide this information if they weren't authorized to be given access to it within a special-interest group or company.

But it's a question pushed forward by Cavanaugh's assertion that organizations will not be able to sustain their journalism. Someone, somewhere, has to fill the gap, he notes.

 

DA25E68FDEC14EAFA7B2A27D26C48058