It is not a light question: What is journalism today?

The deliberations of the Canadian Association of Journalists ethics advisory committee (full disclosure: I am a former member) indicate the answer is neither easy nor bound to be comprehensive by nature. Rather, the committee has set out some principles on the working definition of journalism and its practitioners (in this case, the general public isn't particularly considered a participant).

This week the committee issued its report. Here are some of the conclusions, based in part on also asking what is not journalism:

1. Purpose: An act of journalism sets out to combine evidence-based research and verification with the creative act of storytelling. Its central purpose is to inform communities about topics or issues that they value.

2. Creation. All journalistic work -- whether words, photography or graphics -- contains an element of original production.

3. 
Methods.  Journalistic work provides clear evidence of a self-conscious discipline calculated to provide an accurate and fair description of facts, opinion and debate at play within a situation.

Non-journalists will employ some of these attributes, but the committee believes that "for most purposes, the above three criteria create a three-way definitional 'veto'. That is, all three criteria must be met in order for an act to qualify as journalism. Failure to pass any one of these tests means that the act in question is not journalism, and only journalists will meet -- or, at least, attempt to meet -- all these criteria consistently, fully and deliberately."

Let the debate persist.

 
 
For nearly two decades of Canadian elections now, it has been evident that technology has overtaken the law in how results are permitted to be transmitted.

The Elections Act does not permit results to be broadcast in any time zone before polls have closed. The reasoning is that Canadians should not be influenced by the results from a time zone whose polls have closed and where results can be gleaned.

Of course, that was a more enforceable matter when there was not an Internet; only Canadians who were phoning across the country could share results. But once the Internet surfaced, people could email and non-Canadian sites could publish results.

Efforts were made to suppress those results and crack down on bloggers and others who transmitted results. The biggest losers were the television networks, which had to run pre-game-type programming until local polls closed, then join the national broadcast in progress. In the west, it often meant joining a telecast with an overall outcome long since resolved.

On Friday it was made clear the law will change by the next federal election. Given that there are staggered polling hours that mitigate  closing times, there shouldn't be much of an influence from east to west. And all of the technological workaround and crackdown will be a thing of the past.

An interesting touch: The federal minister who announced the change Tweeted out the announcement.
 

DA25E68FDEC14EAFA7B2A27D26C48058